First of all, let me begin by recommending two books by T. M. Lindsay, neither of which will break the bank. Lindsay was professor of Church history at the Free (later United Free) Church College in Glasgow and an expert on the Reformation.
Firstly,


This is how Lindsay describes the character of the Reformation:
"It was a genuine revival of religion, a fulfillment of the promise of the outpouring of the Spirit of God upon His waiting Church." ('Reformation', second edition, P. 170)
"[The Reformers] had no wish to make a new Church, still less to create a new religion. The religion they professed was the religion of the Old Testament and of the New, the religion of the saints of God from the days of Pentecost downwards. The Church to which they belonged after their severance from Rome was the Church of the Apostles, and of the Martyrs, and of the Church Fathers. It was the Church in which God had been adored, and Christ trusted, and the presence of the Holy Spirit felt from the times of Christ's apostles down to their own day.
Reformation kept them within, they thought; it did not send them out of the Church of their fathers." ('Reformation', second edition, P. 181)
The central principle of the Reformation, according to Lindsay, is the Priesthood of all believers. Is it our principle? IT HAD BETTER BE!
In his larger work on the Reformation, Lindsay writes:
"Luther rediscovered religion when he declared that the truly Christian man must cling directly and with a living faith to the God who speaks to him in Christ, saying, 'I am thy salvation.' The earlier Reformers never forgot this. Luther proclaimed his discovery, he never attempted to prove it by argument; it was something self-evident - seen and known when experienced." ('A History of the Reformation' (Second Ed., T. & T. Clark, 1907) Vol. 1 P. 432).
A somewhat more expensive (but also considerably larger) book on the Reformation is William Cunningham's 'Reformers and the Theology of the Reformation'

Like all of Cunningham's works the 'Reformers' was not originally written as one work, but was compiled and published after his death from materials previously published in magazines and from previously unpublished lectures. His opening sentence is well worth giving here:
"The Reformation from Popery in the sixteenth century was the greatest event, or series of events, that has occurred since the close of the canon of Scripture; and the men who are really entitled to be called the 'Leaders of the Reformation' have a claim to more respect and gratitude than any other body of uninspired men that have ever influenced and adorned the Church." (Cunningham, 'Reformers' P. 1)
Then are not we, who share in the profound convictions that drove the Reformers of the sixteenth century, justified in keeping today, as best we can, as a holy day unto the Lord in thankfulness for those men and what, under Him, they achieved?
I have not read any of these books, but am reading Cunningham's Historical Theology Vol 1. Great book, except I take issue with his idea of the nature of the church - in his mind, it was obviously Presbyterian.
ReplyDeleteThis, of course, is the thing with our veiws of what the early church was like. We all think it was like our own form of Church gov't. So Rome has Peter as the First Pope, etc...
ReplyDeleteI shall address this at greater length tomorrow.